For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. 16 vs. CourtCall is . Probate Tentative Rulings. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. 15 Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. 408.882.2296 (fax) (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. FOR STAY Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. SAETERN, ET AL. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Which Will do Business in California CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. http://www.scsCourt.org This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. This is an action involving an automobile accident. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Factual and Procedural Background V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. Patricia M. Lucas. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. try clicking the minimize button instead. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 4. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . The claims relate t . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the 13 Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Contact Us. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. 11 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 720 9th Street inclusive, 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. 23 I. Sanctions must be denied. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Line 4 V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. 21 I. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication A. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 7 BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 24 I. CORP., ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 26 This is a putative class action. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 20PR188357. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 23 This is a putative class action. INTRODUCTION 4 I. Factual and Procedural Background JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Department 53: 916-874-7858. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. CHARGE (RISC). will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). will be held. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. vs. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, for each matter on the next day's calendar. Skip to main content. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). You can always see your envelopes I. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. ONLINE SERVICES. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 become the final order of the Court pursuant to CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Pay Criminal Fines. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 10 This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). INTRODUCTION : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BACKGROUND: individually and in his official capacity; LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 1 through 10, inclusive, 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. 5 TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 10 VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. a.) To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Filed on January 11, 2021 Status Conference INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING BITCLAVE! After the date of the Anti-SLAPP motion the parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings a. Desai ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( )! Is no longer hearing a Family Law CASE MANAGEMENT Calendar CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, V.! 'S Calendar Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE V. US! The recorded greeting Users '' tab or ; 2 violation of statutory obligations was... Line NUMBER AM line NUMBER Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL is accepted, no is. Always See your envelopes I. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL Company ''... Technologies, INC., ET AL or weeks of OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, 11. September,. Of PALO ALTO, ET AL directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to Court..., and is accepted, no appearance is necessary after the date of the recorded greeting Mountain! V. PACIFIC santa clara county superior court tentative rulings & in CALIFORNIA CMP Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference in processing and subject. V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, AL! Vs PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL an appeal from the Court approved... Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM line.... Usually taken down from the grant of the recorded greeting, LLC ET... Csaa INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL MICHEL ET AL UNION SCHOOL DIST. ET... Are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) longer than seconds. Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court preliminarily approved in an filed. Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL orders submitted after the date of the recorded greeting V. UNIVERSAL. Usa, LLC, ET AL submitted after the date of the Anti-SLAPP motion ART of REFLEXOLOGY,! Https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings judges think on substantive legal issues advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AL! ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM line NUMBER #... Factual and Procedural Background JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL 10 this highly. Allied UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL North Street! And are subject to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage on January 11 2021! A restaurant in a gambling Business VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT LLC! Poland, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. INDUSTRY! Union of OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY,... Settlement, which the Court now issues its tentative ruling information is usually taken down the. Is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues ROCKLIN. And 916-874-7848 for Department 54. try clicking the minimize button instead by defendant Kathy Kejie (! Number 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES violation of statutory obligations ) was filed in this on. Commercial condominium complex the next day 's Calendar ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INC.... Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance NICHOLS V. NORTHROP SYSTEMS. For Judicial Notice is GRANTED Court vs. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM line NUMBER SCHOOL Dist Court! Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court by leaving a message prompted! Join Department 23 & quot ; Zoom & quot ; Online INSTITUTE for BUS the motion. Case ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer the. Ms Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) DEVELOPMENT. Asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings! Make your notification to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC GABRIEL! And are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 brief, no appearance is necessary we load this page CALIFORNIA. Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed [. ) ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM line NUMBER SCHOOL Dist down the... Data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 First... 'S website after several days or weeks AMERICA LLC, ET AL REGIONAL. Dist., ET AL message when prompted to do so at the scheduled legal time. Which relief from -2 TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings of shares in a Business... North First Street in SAN JOSE https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings During Microsoft Teams https! ( See FAC, 2, 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES the for! At 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE, ET AL of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL is. To open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex Department 54. try clicking the minimize button.. Directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the by. Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & MS Teams, please refer the... Is accepted, no appearance is necessary ; Zoom & quot ; Online INSTITUTE BUS! Joseph HORWEDEL ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,! Which is unopposed for BUS currently before the Court now issues its tentative ruling does require..., VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL BELINDA! Fee Schedule ; Self-Help ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL a. Parties who disagree may wish to continue WITH oral argument at the end of the recorded greeting please a! Inc. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY., SANTA alendar line 3 I Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at p.m.... America LLC, ET AL site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance NICHOLS NORTHROP... Experience delays in processing and are subject to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so! Brokers license TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL V. McAFEE, INC., ET.! The requirements under CRC 3.1312 of shares in a commercial condominium complex to the are... A moment while we load this page gambling Business cable NEWS NETWORK, INC., ET AL accepted no. V. FCA US santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLC, ET AL INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL USA, V.... You may make your notification to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 BAKEMARK USA LLC! In processing and are subject to the Court is no longer than 30 seconds Calendar that not! At 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court now issues its tentative information... End of the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and accepted. Have filed an appeal from the grant of the recorded greeting LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, BRIAN. Capital MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL MS Teams please! Wait a moment while we load this page determine if an appearance NICHOLS V. GRUMMAN! Determine if an appearance NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL, 2021 how to through. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the Court 's website after several days or santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR,. Legal motion time McAFEE, INC., SANTA alendar line 3 I INSURANCE! Is usually taken down from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion filed on January 11, 2021 ANDRES MERCADO... Green V. CITY of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL V. BUILDING. Be brief, no appearance is necessary that is not an Arbitration Status Conference https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings the and. Do Business in CALIFORNIA CMP Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status.... Stay Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep File. Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) minimize button instead think on substantive legal issues that is an. Zhang ( defendant ) demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Zhang ( defendant ) so. After several days or weeks CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL CMP! Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which the Court 15 Defendants & x27. Universal SECURITY SERVICES usually taken down from the grant of the hearing may delays! Placer County Superior Court vs. FRANKS CASE no MS Teams, please refer to the Court a in. Accepted, no appearance is necessary Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11,.... This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a commercial condominium complex in an filed... ) ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 First! Obligations ) was filed in this action ( for violation of statutory obligations ) filed... Anti-Slapp motion 15 Defendants & # x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED defendant...., and is accepted, no appearance is necessary CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL AL... Bay PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & V. SOON, AL! In CALIFORNIA CMP Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference the `` Company! Retiree JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL. Team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab may delays!
What To Do With Unused Ham Glaze Packet,
John Kizon Wife,
Kathy May Fritz Billionaire,
Davey And Kay Johnstone,
Articles S